Global warming becomes a big subject of concern for the modern worldwide
society, but not always what the people and the medias say is really true.
Global warming is, in fact, only a Climate Change theory, and there are several
theories about climate change, such as Global Cooling, The Maunder Minimum, The
Sun Spots and others. In spite of not being very known and promoted, these three
last theories appear more exact based on the acquired atmospheric data.
Thousands of scientific, media and government employees have transformed the
simple Global Warming theory into a big business. This business becomes
dangerous because it handles the opinion and change the thought of million of
people with premeditated untruth, treating of not responsive and dangerous the
people who don’t agree with this theory. Al Gore’s emotional and
science-fiction movie helped strongly to create a wrong idea of the problem as
well as the full of mistakes Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s
(IPCC) reports. The 2007 Nobel Prize for both IPCC and Al Gore was the crowning
for this business.
Diverse Climate Change theories have more reliable outcomes than the
Global Warming theory. Climate change is an issue that takes the attention of
the scientists since long time ago and they have been developing diverse
theories about the climate change. As all theories that are used to describe a
physical behaviour, they have deviations, errors and uncertainties, and the
scientists have been working for long time to eradicate or decrease the impact
in their outcomes. The outcomes of each theory and their relationship with the
observable data, give a good indication about which theory is more accurate in
represents the physical phenomenal. Today, theories as Sun Spot or Maunder
Minimum have a more exact relationship with the data and the measures gathered
in the atmosphere and the land by the National Aeronautic and Space
Administration (NASA), European Space Agency (ESA) and a lot of Universities
around the world. The Global Warming theory is simply other theory, and it is
not even the most reliable.
The
Global Warming comes like a religion but with sect behaviour. Thousands and
thousands of people are occupied with promoives worry about the climate change
and the relationship with the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission, especially carbon
dioxide (CO2) emission. All world governments have ministries dedicated to this
subject. People can hear on the radio, to read in newspapers and to see on TV
that thousands and thousands of hours are dedicated to this supposed problem. It
became one of the most important industries in the world and with an incredible
job capacity creation; it has the enviable capacity to generate jobs, and
problems, by itself. This entire crowd has an extreme behaviour, proposing
radical, incoherent and impractical actions. Most people, journalists,
politicians and scientists speak about what they heard on the radio or saw on
TV, but really they don't have the enough knowledge to give a balanced, right
and fair opinion. This superficial and guided behaviour makes that today, it is
politically incorrect not to be careful about the Climate Change and exclusively
don't support the Global Warming theory. These radical behaviours and thoughts
carry not to accept who could think different and see the problem since other
point of view. The people who disagree with this theory and the manner to carry
the problem are considered dangerous and come heretics in this modern religion
called Global Warming.
Al Gore’s film looks like a classic Hollywood science-fiction film. The author plays at the limit of those
subjects that the scientists have under discussion, and he guides false outcomes
that they remark the relationship between the climate change and GHG emission.
With others subjects, he goes to unexpected limits, saying, and knowing that he
is doing it, big falsehoods. In the United Kingdom (UK), a group of people felt
affected by the Al Gore’s film did a judgement and finally the judge found at
least nine premeditated falsehoods in the movie. Also, Al Gore doesn't explain
that in the its history, the earth had several and long periods with a lot more
or much less CO2 concentration in the atmosphere that today, without being a
catastrophe for the life and the planet. The most emotional lie is about the
polar bears: Al Gore says that the polar bears died after they had not found
water and ice where to live and hunt, but it was proven by National
Geographic’s videos that the polar bears died after they were lost because a
wind and snow storm. Without a doubt, Al Gore reaches to capture the attention
of the people as science-fiction movie, but the people don’t separate the
movie message and the reality, and the damage is done.
The IPCC reports are political conclusions, not technical conclusions, as
it is the essence of the IPCC. The IPCC was created under Margaret Thatcher’s
United Nation (UN) demand during the early eighties. The UK had several energy problems at that time, and Thatcher's
government confronted the miners' strike that affected the Power Electricity
generation, based on Coal Plants. The Nuclear Power electricity generation
wasn’t getting good press but its GHG emission is negligible compared to the
traditional Power generation. In this way, Thatcher's government supported the
IPCC creation and gave them a lot of money to find the link between the
incipient Climate Change problem and the CO2 emission; the next step would be to
support the Nuclear Power plant for electricity generation in the UK. The first IPCC goal was to change the thought of the people
about Nuclear Power electricity generation, but the situation lost control when
in 1989 the Berlin Wall fell down and the IPCC goal was taken as ideology
against the first world. The GHG emission, and mainly CO2 emission, is related
with industrial activity, and in turn related with Occident. This radical crowd,
who was lost their way with the Berlin Wall fall, took as new flag against
occident the environmental problems and they found in the IPCC their weapon to
fight. Today, the IPCC's reports are full of premeditated errors and the 2500
top scientists that UN says belong to the writing and researching groups, is
false. Also a lot of scientific don't agree with the conclusion and they are in
this top list. The IPCC was born as political instrument and it continues
working under its creation essence.
The 2007 Nobel Prize was other great play. To honor to Al Gore and IPCC
with the 2007 Novel Price escapes to all logic and confirms the fact that all
this movement it is only a political movement, with purposes strictly political.
What is the Al Gore and IPCC contribution to world peace? Nothing, nothing to do
with the peace, nothing to do with the New World order, nothing to do with
abusing power and nothing to do with getting global control. Only people and
institutions are generating work, distinctions and business for and by
themselves.
The Global Warming theory and their supporters went too far. It is known
that the actual global economic system periodically needs an incentive to
introduce new business opportunities. The “just to it” producing method and
“ISO 9000” quality certification in the eighties and the “Y2k” computer
problem in the nineties show that around even 10 years appears a new theory to
introduce the noise that the global business needs to look forward the global
economy. The Global Warming theory is quickly modifying not only the business on
the world, also the thought of the people with radical and intolerant behaviour,
and erroneous predictions. The damage, without any doubt, is already done.